The smarter way
to do assignments.

Please note that this is just a preview of a school assignment posted on our website by one of our clients. If you need assistance with this question too, please click on the Order button at the bottom of the page to get started.

Rick purchases two goods, food and clothing. He has a diminishing marginal rate of substitution of food for clothing. Let x denote the amount of food consumed and y the amount of clothing. Suppose the price of food increases from two on a clearly labelled graph, illustrate the income and substitution effects of the price change on the consumption of food. Do so for each of the following cases:
a) Case 1: Food is a normal good.
b) Case 2: The income elasticity of demand for food is zero.
c) Case 3: Food is an inferior good, but not a Geffen good.
d) Case 4: Food is a Geffen good.
Solution:- a) Given the increase in the price of x, we expect to see the following effects: Because the price of x increased, x became relatively more expensive, and y became relatively less expensive. As a result, Rick substitutes away from x in favor ofy. This is represented in the table by a down arrow for x and an up arrow for y in the substitution effect column. Moreover, the increase in the price of x reduced Ricks purchasing power. Since x and y are both normal goods (x being a normal good is given by the problem, y being a normal good is assumed), the reduction in purchasing power causes Rick to purchase less of both x and y. This is represented in the table by the down arrows in the income effect column. The following diagram gives us a graphical representation of the information presented in the table:- b) In this case, we expect to see the following effects this case, Once again, because the price of x increased, Rick substitutes away from x in favor of y . This is represented in the table by a down arrow for x and an up arrow for y in the substitution effect column. However, the information in the income effect column has changed. Since the income elasticity of demand for x is zero, the reduction in Ricks purchasing power has no effect on x. This is represented by the horizontal line for x in the income effect column. (The down arrow for y reflects the fact that we are continuing to assume that yis a normal…

d.) The following diagram gives us a graphical representation of the information presented in the table: c) In this case, we expect to see the following effects: Once again, because the price of x increased, Rick substitutes away from x in favor of y. Moreover, the reduction in Ricks purchasing power reduces his demand for y (a normal good). What is new is that x is an inferior good; that is, the reduction in Ricks purchasing power causes Rick to purchase more x. This is rep resented by the up arrow for x in the income effect column. The following diagram gives us a graphical representation of the information presented in the table: d) In this case, we expect to see the following effects: The last thing to take note of is that the diagram indicates that x is a Giffen good. The diagram indicates that the income effect dominates the substitution effect; that is, the increase in x going from B to C is large than the decrease in x going from A to B.

## GET HELP WITH THIS ASSIGNMENT TODAY

Clicking on this button will take you to our custom assignment page. Here you can fill out all the additional details for this particular paper (grading rubric, academic style, number of sources etc), after which your paper will get assigned to a course-specific writer. If you have any issues/concerns, please don’t hesitate to contact our live support team or email us right away.